1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 85 Ohio
  5. 85 Ohio St.3d 294 (1999)
 

CINCINNATI BAR ASSN. v. ARNOLD

No. 98-2663.

85 Ohio St.3d 294 (1999)

CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. ARNOLD.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 31, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eagan, Wykoff & Healy Co., L.P.A., and Jack S. Healy; Rendigs, Fry, Kiely & Dennis, L.L.P., and Thomas S. Shore, Jr., for relator.

John H. Burlew, for respondent.

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. In determining the proper sanction, we have held that absent mitigating circumstances, the appropriate sanction for misappropriation of client funds is disbarment. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Knowlton (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 76, 78, 689 N.E.2d 538, 539. In Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. Hallows (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 75...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases