1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 266 A.D.2d
  5. 266 A.D.2d 108 (1999)
 

PLOTNICK v. PLOTNICK

266 A.D.2d 108 (1999)

698 N.Y.S.2d 468

TAMMY PLOTNICK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL I. PLOTNICK, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided November 18, 1999.

The court, after determining that the Referee had duly considered the factors set forth in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6) (a), properly exercised its discretion in increasing the recommended maintenance award to the wife, despite the relatively short duration of the marriage and her good health, in light of the marked disparity between the parties' income and earning capacity (see, Denholz v Denholz, 147 A.D.2d 522, 524...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases