1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 84 Ohio
  5. 84 Ohio St.3d 288 (1999)
 

STATE EX REL. S&Z v. INDUS. COMM.

No. 96-1690.

84 Ohio St.3d 288 (1999)

THE STATE EX REL. S&Z TOOL & DIE COMPANY, INC., APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 6, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Persky, Shapiro, Salim, Esper, Arnoff & Nolfi Co., L.P.A., and Donald N. Jaffe, for appellant.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Miltina A. Gavia, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy and Marc J. Jaffy, for appellee Peicu.

Per Curiam.

S&Z did not comply with Ohio Adm.Code 4121:1-5-17(E)—a point that it does not seriously dispute. At issue is the causal relationship, if any, between S&Z's noncompliance and claimant's injury.

We recently discussed the specific safety requirement currently at issue in State ex rel. Burchfield v. Printech Corp. (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 169, 699 N.E.2d 56. In that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases