This action for fraud, commenced more than a decade subsequent to the alleged fraud and more than two years after the fraud should have been discovered had plaintiff exercised reasonable diligence, was properly dismissed as time-barred (CPLR 203 [f]; 213 [8]). The fraud, as alleged, occurred in 1982, when plaintiff loaned defendant some $70,000 to be invested in a restaurant business, yet although plaintiff, according to his testimony, knew by 1992 that defendant was not...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.