The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. There was ample evidence from which the jury could reasonably infer that defendant's display of what appeared to be a firearm and his thefts of various items from a newsstand were parts of a single continuous incident. Defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
