DOUGLAS-HANSON CO., INC. v. BF GOODRICH CO.

No. 98-1737.

229 Wis.2d 132 (1999)

598 N.W.2d 262

DOUGLAS-HANSON COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BF GOODRICH COMPANY, Defendant-Plaintiff.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided June 29, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Eric J. Magnuson, John B. Lunseth and Ernest W. Grumbles of Rider, Bennett, Egan & Arundel, LLP, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and Daniel W. Hildebrand of DeWitt Ross & Stevens S.C. of Madison.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Scott S. Payzant and Lisa M. Agrimonti of Doherty, Rumble & Butler Professional Association, St. Paul, Minnesota.

Before Cane, C.J., Myse, P.J., and Hoover, J.


MYSE, P.J.

BF Goodrich Company appeals a judgment awarding Douglas-Hanson Company, Inc. $1,832,134 in compensatory damages and $1,000,000 in punitive damages. Douglas-Hanson claims it is entitled to tort damages as a result of Goodrich's intentional misrepresentation that it had a commercially viable adhesive product that it was able to deliver to Douglas-Hanson for processing. Goodrich contends that the trial court erroneously denied Goodrich's motion for judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases