1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 80 F.Supp.2d
  5. 80 F.Supp.2d 273 (1999)
 

CONCERN SOJUZVNESHTRANS v. BUYANOVSKI

No. Civ.A. 98-4490.

80 F.Supp.2d 273 (1999)

CONCERN SOJUZVNESHTRANS, Plaintiff, v. Lev Mikhailovich BUYANOVSKI, Vladimir Aleksandrovich Emerel and Interform USA, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

August 31, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Randall K. Anderson, Fishman, Herrmann & Anderson, New York City, NY, Samuel H. Turetsky, Passaic, NJ, for plaintiff.

Eric Wertheim, New York City, NY, for defendant Lev Buyanovsky.

Val Mandel, New York City, NY, Michael Edelson, Hellring Lindeman Goldstein & Siegal, Newark, NJ, for defendant Aleksandrovich Emerel.

OPINION

WOLIN, District Judge.

Before the Court are the motions of defendants Lev Buyanovsky ("Buyanovsky") and Vladimir Emerel ("Emerel") (together, "defendants") to dismiss plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.1 The Court has decided the matters on the papers pursuant to Rule 78. For the following reasons, the Court will grant in part and deny in part defendants' motions for dismissal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases