1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 225 Wis.2d
  5. 225 Wis.2d 126 (1999)
 

PROSSER v. LEUCK

No. 97-0686.

225 Wis.2d 126 (1999)

592 N.W.2d 178

Robert PROSSER, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Richard A. LEUCK and Cedarburg Mutual Insurance Company, Defendants-Respondents-Cross-Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided April 21, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff-appellant-cross respondent-petitioner there were briefs by Jason W. Whitley and Novitzke, Gust & Sempf, Amery and oral argument by Jason W. Whitley.

For the defendants-respondents-cross-appellants there was a brief by Timothy M. Doyle and Thrasher, Doyle, Pelish & Franti, Ltd., Rice Lake and oral argument by Timothy M. Doyle.

¶ 1. WILLIAM A. BABLITCH, J.

Petitioner, Robert Prosser (Prosser), requests that this court reverse the court of appeals' decision which determined that Prosser's settlement offer to respondent Cedarburg Mutual Insurance Company (Cedarburg) was ambiguous and therefore invalid. Accordingly, the court of appeals also determined that Prosser was not entitled to double costs and interest from Cedarburg. The ambiguity arose from the lack of clarity as to whether the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases