STATE EX REL. BRUGGEMAN v. AUGLAIZE CTY. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

No. 99-956.

87 Ohio St.3d 257 (1999)

THE STATE EX REL. BRUGGEMAN, APPELLANT, v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF AUGLAIZE COUNTY ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 1, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher R. Bruggeman, pro se.

Edwin A. Pierce, Auglaize County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees.


Per Curiam.

Bruggeman asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his habeas corpus petition. For the following reasons, Bruggeman's assertion is meritless.

In order to prevail on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a child custody case, the petitioner must establish that (1) the child is being unlawfully detained, and (2) the petitioner has the superior legal right to custody of the child. Holloway v. Clermont Cty. Dept...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases