1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 88 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 88 Cal.Rptr.2d 255 (1999)
 

APARTMENT ASS'N OF L.A. v. CITY OF L.A.

No. B130243.

88 Cal.Rptr.2d 255 (1999)

APARTMENT ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

Review Granted December 15, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

California Apartment Law Information Foundation, Trevor Grimm, Los Angeles, and Craig Mordoh, Santa Monica, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

James K. Hahn, City Attorney, Ronald Tuller, Assistant City Attorney, and Miguel A. Dager, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

MIRIAM A. VOGEL, J.

The question before us is whether a fee imposed on residential rental properties to fund a program for the eradication of substandard housing is a charge upon real property within the meaning of Proposition 218. We conclude that it is, and that the fee is void and unenforceable in light of the City of Los Angeles's failure to follow the constitutionally mandated procedure for the adoption of such fees.

FACTS

Proposition 218...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases