1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 249 Conn.
  5. 249 Conn. 94 (1999)
 

KIM v. MAGNOTTA

(SC 15995)

249 Conn. 94 (1999)

YEONG GIL KIM ET AL. v. DOMINICK MAGNOTTA ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Officially released June 1, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward T. Krumeich, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Stanley S. Zinner, pro hac vice, with whom was Howard I. Gemeiner, for the appellee (named defendant).

Callahan, C. J., and Borden, Norcott, McDonald and Peters, Js.

Opinion

PETERS, J.

This certified appeal raises issues that are at the crossroads of the remedial provisions of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA); General Statutes §§ 42-110b and 42-110g;1 and the four month limitation period for opening judgments contained both in General Statutes § 52-212a and Practice Book § 17-4.2 The specific question is whether a trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases