The court properly exercised its discretion in precluding introduction of a police report alleged to contain a prior inconsistent statement of a witness. Upon our examination of the record, we conclude that there was no inconsistency because the witness's reference to a conversation with another person about the identity of the perpetrator did not imply that the witness lacked personal knowledge of such identity. Accordingly, the report was lacking in probative value (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. ROSARIO
267 A.D.2d 73 (1999)
701 N.Y.S.2d 341
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERTO ROSARIO, Also Known as PASCAL CONCEPCION, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 9, 1999.
Decided December 9, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
