The motion court properly found that the handwritten provision in the 1982 compromise order, directing that monies received on the infant plaintiff's behalf be deposited into a specific money market account at defendant bank, took precedence over the order's typewritten directive to the effect that the subject funds were to be deposited into the bank's "highest interest bearing" account. This being the case plaintiff's damages were properly limited to the amount of interest...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
