IN RE IMPOUNDED

No. 98-6498.

178 F.3d 150 (1999)

In re IMPOUNDED.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Filed May 13, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeremy D. Margolis, Edward E. McNally (Argued), Robert M. Andalman (Argued), Altheimer & Gray, Chicago, IL, for John Doe 1 and John Doe 2.

James R. Streicker, Terence H. Campbell, Cotsirilos, Stephenson, Tighe & Streicker, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for John Doe 3.

Joel I. Klein, Assistant Attorney General, A. Douglas Melamed, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, John J. Powers, III, John P. Fonte (Argued), Anthony V. Nanni, Reginald K. Tom, Matthew D. Segal, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Before: RENDELL, ALDISERT Circuit Judges, WILLIAMS, District Judge


OPINION OF THE COURT

RENDELL, Circuit Judge.

This case involves the question of when a fear of foreign prosecution implicates the Fifth Amendment privilege after the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Balsys, 524 U.S. 666, 118 S.Ct. 2218, 141 L.Ed.2d 575 (1998). Appellants are immunized witnesses who have refused to testify before a grand jury, claiming that their case falls within a test articulated in

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases