MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY v. BARR LABORATORIES, INC.

No. 97 CIV. 6317 JES.

38 F.Supp.2d 289 (1999)

MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY and Bristol-myers Squibb Company, Plaintiffs, v. BARR LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 5, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, New York, NY, Errol B. Taylor, Lee A. Goldberg, of Counsel, for Plaintiffs.

Bryan Cave LLP, New York, NY, Philippe Bennett, of Counsel, for Defendant.

Winston & Strawn, Washington, D.C., Charles B. Molster III, Michael K. Atkinson, of Counsel, for Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SPRIZZO, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Mead Johnson & Company and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (collectively "Mead Johnson") bring the instant action for patent infringement against defendant Barr Laboratories, Inc. ("Barr"), alleging that Barr has infringed U.S. Patent No. 4,258,027 (the "'027 patent") by submitting Abbreviated New Drug Application ("ANDA") No. 71-196 with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"). Mead...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases