1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 262 A.D.2d
  5. 262 A.D.2d 62 (1999)
 

PEOPLE v. ROSADO

262 A.D.2d 62 (1999)

691 N.Y.S.2d 452

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. IGNACIO ROSADO, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided June 8, 1999.

Although the court did not notify defense counsel prior to complying with the deliberating jury's request for chalk and a ruler, reversal pursuant to People v O'Rama (78 N.Y.2d 270) is not mandated because the jury's note did not request any substantive information (see, People v Damiano, 87 N.Y.2d 477, 487). Defendant's claim that the jury may have made improper use of these materials is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases