PROTIC v. DENGLER

No. 98 Civ. 8179(LAK).

46 F.Supp.2d 277 (1999)

Misho A. PROTIC, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth DENGLER, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

April 28, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Barsch, Alfred E. Smith, New York City, for plaintiff.

Peter L. Altieri, Sandra J. Libeson, Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C., New York City, for defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION (CORRECTED)

KAPLAN, District Judge.

Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint, which alleges claims for tortious interference with prospective employment opportunities, libel and slander. Plaintiff cross-moves for leave to amend. The only substantial argument raised in opposition to the cross-motion is that the amendment would be futile because it would not cure the alleged deficiencies of the original complaint. Accordingly, the Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases