KING v. NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORP.


267 A.D.2d 48 (1999)

699 N.Y.S.2d 280

ALEX KING et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORP., Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided December 7, 1999.


The motion was properly granted on a record demonstrating that the action was settled in open court after settlement discussions that actively engaged the parties, their attorneys and the court. Moreover, plaintiff himself acknowledged the settlement in a letter. Plaintiffs' present dissatisfaction with the amount of the settlement is not a valid basis for vacating the settlement, absent a showing of fraud, collusion, mistake or accident (see, Hallock v State of New York...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases