1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 257 A.D.2d
  5. 257 A.D.2d 53 (1999)
 

JONES v. MAPLES

257 A.D.2d 53 (1999)

691 N.Y.S.2d 429

CHUCK JONES, Respondent, v. MARLA MAPLES, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 27, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chuck Jones, respondent pro se.

Jeffrey L. Goldman and Magda L. Cruz of counsel (Sherwin Belkin on the brief; Belkin Burden Wenig & Goldman, L. L. P., attorneys), for appellant.

ROSENBERGER, J. P., WILLIAMS and BUCKLEY, JJ., concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

SAXE, J.

The order of the IAS Court authorizing plaintiff pro se, Chuck Jones, to conduct a videotaped deposition of defendant Marla Maples, albeit with the protection presumably provided by the presence of a Judicial Hearing Officer (JHO), must be reversed. In these truly unique circumstances, permitting Jones to proceed with a videotaped deposition of Maples is a frightening prospect, and constitutes an improvident exercise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases