In the Matter of ROBERT GANLEY, on Behalf of Himself and Other Former Members of the New York City Transit Authority and Housing Authority Police Departments, et al., Appellants,
v.
RUDOLPH W. GIULIANI, as Mayor of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.
LIEUTENANTS' BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, by Its President, ANTHONY GARVEY, et al., Appellants,
v.
CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.
In the Matter of STANLEY HILL, as Executive Director of District Council 37, American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, et al., Appellants,
v.
CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued October 21, 1999.
Decided November 30, 1999.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Dienst & Serrins, L. L. P., New York City (Richard A. Dienst and Leslie H. Ben-Zvi of counsel), for appellants in the first above-entitled proceeding.
O'Donnell, Schwartz, Glanstein & Rosen, L. L. P., New York City (Joel C. Glanstein and Howard Wien of counsel), for appellants in the second above-entitled proceeding.
Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel of New York City (Jane S. Earle and Pamela Seider Dolgow of counsel), for Rudolph W. Giuliani and others, respondents in the first and second above-entitled proceedings.
Byron S. Menegakis, New York City, Jeffrey Schanback and Steven J. Rappaport for New York City Housing Authority, respondent in the second above-entitled proceeding.
Leonard D. Polletta, New York City, and Richard J. Ferreri for appellants in the third above-entitled proceeding.
Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel of New York City (Jane S. Earle and Pamela Seider Dolgow of counsel), for respondents in the third above-entitled proceeding.
Chief Judge KAYE and Judges BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK and ROSENBLATT concur.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
OPINION OF THE COURT
WESLEY, J.
In Matter of Legum v Goldin (55 N.Y.2d 104), this Court held that payments to the City of New York pursuant to section 1127 of the City Charter are premised on a contract between the City and certain of its nonresident employees. These related appeals now ask us to determine whether this section applies to nonresidents of the City...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
