1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 84 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 84 Cal.Rptr.2d 216 (1999)
 

BLONDER v. CUMBERLAND ENGINEERING

No. E022038.

84 Cal.Rptr.2d 216 (1999)

71 Cal.App.4th 1057

David BLONDER, Cross-Complainant and Respondent, v. CUMBERLAND ENGINEERING, Cross-Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

April 29, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rus, Miliband, Williams & Smith, Joel S. Miliband and D. Edward Hays, Irvine, for Cross-Defendant and Appellant.

Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro, Joseph A. Eisenberg, Neil C. Erickson and Mike D. Neue, Los Angeles, for Cross-Complainant and Respondent.

Certified for Partial Publication.*

OPINION

RICHLI, J.

Respondent David Blonder, as assignee for the benefit of creditors of Envirothene, Inc., obtained a judgment invalidating security interests held by appellant Cumberland Engineering in certain assets of Envirothene, as preferential transfers under Code of Civil Procedure section 1800. We affirm the judgment, concluding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases