The supplementary uninsured motorist clause in issue covers the named insured and "while residents of the same household, [the named insured's] spouse and * * * relatives". Even if the word "spouse" could be understood to include same-sex partners living together in a spousal-type relationship, plaintiff fails to raise an issue of fact as to whether such was the nature of his relationship with the named insured (cf., 390 W. End Assocs. v Wildfoerster,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ORTIZ v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY
267 A.D.2d 33 (1999)
699 N.Y.S.2d 370
VINCENT ORTIZ, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al., Defendants, and THE TRAVELERS, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 7, 1999.
Decided December 7, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
