The record demonstrates that, contrary to defendant's contention, his bail was reinstated, not exonerated, on February 22, 1990. Accordingly, a new forfeiture order was properly entered on June 19, 1990 when defendant failed to appear in court due to his incarceration. Thus, it was a proper exercise of discretion to deny the motion for remission since defendant's incarceration after committing a crime while out on bail "did not constitute an exceptional circumstance, and...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
