STATE v. OSWALD

No. 97-1026-CR.

232 Wis.2d 62 (1999)

2000 WI App 2

606 N.W.2d 207

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Theodore OSWALD, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided December 8, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Jerome F. Buting and Kathleen B. Stilling of Buting & Williams, S.C. of Brookfield. There was oral argument by Jerome F. Buting.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Paul Lundsten, assistant attorney general and James E. Doyle, attorney general. There was oral argument by Paul Lundsten.

Before Brown, P.J., Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ.


¶ 1. ANDERSON, J.

Theodore Oswald appeals from a nineteen-count judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. A new trial is warranted, he argues, because of juror bias, juror misconduct and ineffective assistance of trial counsel. First, he contends that the circuit court erroneously denied his motions to remove three jurors for cause, forcing him to use his peremptory strikes to remove them. Because he used his peremptory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases