WALKER v. PRINCE


266 A.D.2d 27 (1999)

697 N.Y.S.2d 607

DIANE B. WALKER, Respondent, v. KENNETH A. PRINCE, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided November 4, 1999.


Defendant's contention that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence is without merit, since the verdict was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence (Hoffson v Orentreich, 168 A.D.2d 243, 244). Objective medical evidence established that plaintiff suffered a serious injury as a result of the 1994 automobile accident. The jury was entitled to reject the testimony of the defense witnesses to the extent that they concluded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases