Summary judgment was properly awarded since plaintiff's theory that his injury was caused by bald tires on defendants' van is unsupported by any probative evidence in admissible form and amounts to sheer conjecture and speculation (see, Burgos v Aqueduct Realty Corp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
HOLTZER v. LONDON MEAT CO., INC.
266 A.D.2d 26 (1999)
697 N.Y.S.2d 275
GEORGE HOLTZER, Appellant, v. LONDON MEAT CO., INC., et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 4, 1999.
Decided November 4, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.