Vacatur was properly denied on the ground that the assertion of defendant's President that he knew of no condition on the staircase that could have caused plaintiff's fall is conclusory, given plaintiff's allegations of inadequate handrails and lighting, and deficient as an affidavit of merit (see, Zapater v 2540 Assocs.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.