DEXTER v. HOROWITZ MANAGEMENT


267 A.D.2d 21 (1999)

698 N.Y.S.2d 33

VIOLET DEXTER, Respondent, v. HOROWITZ MANAGEMENT, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided December 2, 1999.


There is no evidence that Horowitz Management's failure to produce a witness who had, subsequent to the accident, left its employ was willful and contumacious so as to justify the drastic remedy of preclusion (see, Maillard v Maillard, 243 A.D.2d 448), which, in the circumstances, was tantamount to striking the answer. Horowitz, an out-of-possession landlord pursuant to a lease that imposes upon the tenant the sole responsibility...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases