Defendant's speedy trial motion was properly denied. The record supports the court's finding that the total amount of includable time did not exceed the statutory threshold. We specifically note that defendant failed to preserve his present argument that the January 17 and February 15, 1996 adjournments were not for the purpose of motion practice (see, CPL 30.30 [4] [a]; see, People v Goode,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.