The motion was properly denied, there being competent objective medical evidence sufficient to raise issues of fact as to whether plaintiff was unable to perform substantially all of her daily activities for at least 90 out of the 180 days following the accident, and whether she suffers from range of motion limitations that are either "permanent" or "significant" within the meaning of the statute (see, Bitici v New York City Tr. Auth.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
