1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 85 Ohio
  5. 85 Ohio St.3d 169 (1999)
 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WISE

No. 98-2213.

85 Ohio St.3d 169 (1999)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WISE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 24, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, and Lori J. Brown, First Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

J. Gerald Ingram, for respondent.

Per Curiam.

The normal sanction for misappropriation of client funds is disbarment. Disciplinary Counsel v. Connaughton (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 644, 645, 665 N.E.2d 675, 676, and cases cited therein. However, on some occasions because of mitigating circumstances, we have given weight to a board recommendation of a lesser sanction. Disciplinary Counsel v. Kurtz (1998),

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases