DIME SAVINGS BANK OF WALLINGFORD v. ARPAIA

(AC 18764)

55 Conn. App. 180 (1999)

DIME SAVINGS BANK OF WALLINGFORD v. NICHOLAS E. ARPAIA III ET AL.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Officially released October 5, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sydney T. Schulman, for the appellant (named defendant).

Stan R. Dombroski, for the appellee (substitute plaintiff).

O'Connell, C. J., and Foti and Spear, Js.


Opinion

SPEAR, J.

The trial court opened a judgment of foreclosure by sale and, after denying the named defendant's request to file an answer, rendered judgment setting a new date for the sale. Thereafter, the named defendant, Nicholas E. Arpaia III, filed an appeal. He claims that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the original plaintiff, Dime Savings Bank of Wallingford (Dime), obtained an earlier judgment of foreclosure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases