Arnold asserts in his sole proposition of law that the court of appeals erred by dismissing his mandamus action. Arnold's assertion is meritless.
Arnold had an adequate legal remedy by appeal to raise his claim concerning the trial court's alleged failure to journalize decisions relating to the speedy-trial provisions. See State v. King (1994),
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.