CROWDER v. ALUMAFLEX

(94-12846; CA A95865)

986 P.2d 1269 (1999)

163 Or. App. 143

In the Matter of the Compensation of Ferral C. Crowder, Claimant. Ferral C. CROWDER, Petitioner, v. ALUMAFLEX and Employers Insurance Of Wausau, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 29, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald M. Hooton, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Abigail V. Marshall, Beaverton, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and WARDEN, Senior Judge.


ARMSTRONG, J.

Claimant seeks review of a decision by the Workers' Compensation Board that denied his claim for increased permanent partial disability (PPD) benefits under the 1995 amendment to ORS 656.214(6). The Board denied the claim on the ground that claimant had not raised the issue of the PPD rate on reconsideration of the determination order in which the PPD rate had been applied. Claimant also challenges the Board...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases