CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY FORCE ACCOUNT COUNCIL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
AMADOR WATER AGENCY, Defendant and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Third District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 27, 1999.
Rehearing Denied May 21, 1999.
Review Denied August 11, 1999.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Stanton, Kay & Watson and Ralph E. Livingstone, Sacramento, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.,
Bartkiewicz, Kronick & Shanahan, Alan B. Lilly and Stephen A. Kronick, Sacramento, for Defendant and Respondent.
MeMurchie, Brandenburger, Weill, Lenahan & Lee, David W. MeMurchie, Vicki E. Hartigan, for California Special Districts Association as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.
Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard, and Janet K. Goldsmith, Sacramento, for Association of California Water Agencies as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Third District.
NICHOLSON, Acting P.J.
The plaintiffs1 brought this action to challenge the statutory authority of defendant Amador Water Agency (Agency) to complete a project valued in excess of $130,000 by using its own personnel rather than by advertising for bids from outside contractors. Because this case turns on statutory interpretation, the parties submitted the matter to the superior court on stipulated facts. The superior court entered judgment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
