IN RE SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE OF LAW

No. 99-0830.

4 S.W.3d 219 (1999)

In re SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE OF LAW and Texas A & M University, Relators.

Supreme Court of Texas.

September 14, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John L. Hill, Jr., Roland Garcia, Jr., James E. Essig, Houston, Joseph Latting, Raul A. Gonzalez, Roy Q. Minton, David F. Minton, Austin, T. Gerald Treece, Houston, Douglas W. Alexander, Jane M.N. Webre, Poweres, Marcy H. Greer, Mary S. Dietz, Austin, Arno W. Krebs, Jr., Houston, Deborah A. Verbil, Austin, for petitioner.

Shannon W. Ratliff, Lisa A Paulson, Scott Steven Cooley, Austin, for respondent.


Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied.

Justice HECHT, dissenting from the denial of the petition for writ of mandamus.

Relators in this original mandamus proceeding, South Texas College of Law and Texas A & M University, complain of the district court's refusal to allow them to supersede a judgment declaring their Affiliation Agreement to be void and permanently enjoining them from continuing to operate under it. Because I believe that relators are entitled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases