1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 986 P.2d
  5. 986 P.2d 1244 (1999)
 

JEBOUSEK v. CITY OF NEWPORT

(LUBA No. 97-182; CA A106178)

986 P.2d 1244 (1999)

163 Or. App. 126

Nyla L. JEBOUSEK, Petitioner, v. CITY OF NEWPORT, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 29, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nyla L. Jebousek, argued the cause and filed the brief pro se.

Elizabeth A. Fetsch, Newport, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Minor, Bandonis, Connell & Fetsch, P.C.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge, and KISTLER, Judge.

DEITS, C.J.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA's decision affirming an application for a lot line adjustment.1 Petitioner makes four assignments of error, each of which we have considered and only one of which requires specific discussion.

Goal 1, Policy 3, of the relevant part of the city's comprehensive plan provides:

"Where hazardous areas have not been specifically identified but there is a reason to believe that a potential...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases