HOLZEMER v. URBANSKI

No. 98-1291.

86 Ohio St.3d 129 (1999)

HOLZEMER, APPELLEE, v. URBANSKI ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 28, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kolb & Heban, Richard Kolb and Kevin A. Heban, for appellee.

Robison, Curphey & O'Connell and Ronald S. Moening; Kroncke, DArcangelo, Sutter & Furey and Thomas R. Furey, for appellants.


ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J.

The issue presented is whether, in the circumstances of this case, the doctrine of res judicata operates to preclude Holzemer from moving forward to litigate the claims set forth in her complaint. For the reasons that follow, we determine that Holzemer's claims are not precluded by res judicata and so affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Defendants support the trial court's grant of summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases