KRAEMER v. HARDING

(941891; CA A97884)

976 P.2d 1160 (1999)

159 Or. App. 90

James M. KRAEMER, Respondent, v. Jeffrey M. HARDING, Patricia A. Harding, John Lundberg and Janet Lundberg, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 17, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kim E. Hoyt, Salem, argued the cause for appellants. With her on the briefs were Ferder, Brandt, Casebeer, Cooper, Hoyt & French, LLP.

Edward J. Harri, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was James C. Egan, and Emmons, Kropp, Kryger, Alexander, Egan & Elmer, P.C., Albany.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and WARREN, Senior Judge.


EDMONDS, P.J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff on his claims for defamation, intentional interference with economic relations and intentional infliction of emotional distress. They assign error to the trial court's denial of their motion for a directed verdict on each claim, its submission of the punitive damages issue to the jury, its instructions to the jury on that issue and its failure to reduce the punitive damage award. We affirm.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases