1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 981 P.2d
  5. 981 P.2d 1146 (1999)
 

LAMAR CORP. v. CITY OF TWIN FALLS

No. 24304.

981 P.2d 1146 (1999)

133 Idaho 36

The LAMAR CORPORATION, a Louisiana corporation, successor-in-interest to Northwest Outdoor Advertising, L.L.C., an Idaho limited liability company, d/b/a Idaho Outdoor Advertising, successor-in-interest to Kunz & Company, a California corporation d/b/a Idaho Outdoor Advertising, Petitioner-Respondent-Cross Appellant, v. The CITY OF TWIN FALLS, an Idaho municipal corporation, and the City Council of the City of Twin Falls, Respondents-Appellants-Cross Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Twin Falls, March 1999 Term.

June 11, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wonderlich & Wakefield, Twin Falls, for appellants. Jacqueline S. Wakefield argued.

Hepworth, Lezamiz & Hohnhorst, Twin Falls, for respondents. John C. Hohnhorst argued.

KIDWELL, Justice.

The City Council of the City of Twin Falls (City Council) and City of Twin Falls (collectively, City) appeal a decision of the district court reversing a zoning decision of the City Council. The City Council had denied the application of Idaho Outdoor Advertising1 (Idaho Outdoor) for a special use permit to erect a billboard. The district court reversed, ruling that the Twin Falls zoning ordinance unconstitutionally limited...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases