STATE v. TITUS

(CC 93-1324; CA A89485; SC S43817)

982 P.2d 1133 (1999)

328 Or. 475

STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Tracey Mack TITUS, Petitioner on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided May 20, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary M. Reese, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With her on the briefs was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Douglas F. Zier, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, and DURHAM, Justices.


CARSON, C.J.

This criminal case presents three questions, each involving evidentiary issues. First, whether, as defendant contends, the trial court erred by excluding evidence suggesting that a state's witness improperly had attempted to influence the trial by threatening a defense witness. Second, whether the trial court improperly admitted certain hearsay evidence. Third, whether the trial court erred when it admitted, over his relevancy objection, evidence of defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases