Crimmins, J.
This appeal raises the issue of at what point were there facts which the plaintiff knew or reasonably should have known so as to cause the statute of limitations to have begun to run.
The trial judge determined that this action was barred by the statute of limitations. We find there was no error.
On or about November 14, 1994, the plaintiffs filed this action against the defendant, alleging negligent preparation of a plan of land which...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
