1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 983 P.2d
  5. 983 P.2d 1044 (1999)
 

YOUNG v. STATE

(97C-10933; CA A100530)

983 P.2d 1044 (1999)

161 Or. App. 32

David YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Oregon, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 2, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Hoag, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Mary H. Williams, Assistant Solicitor General.

Before De MUNIZ, Presiding Judge, and LANDAU and HASELTON, Judges.

De MUNIZ, P.J.

In this declaratory judgment case, plaintiff challenges the trial court's determination that the overtime pay provisions of ORS 279.340(1) (1995)1 did not apply to state managerial and executive employees.

At all relevant times, the state2 employed plaintiff in a salaried position. In 1995, the legislature amended ORS 279.340(1) to include the state in the overtime compensation law; before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases