1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 720 N.E.2d
  5. 720 N.E.2d 1287 (1999)
 

HALL v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE REVENUE

No. 49T10-9306-TA-00036.

720 N.E.2d 1287 (1999)

Keith and Mary HALL, Petitioners, v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE REVENUE, Respondent.

Tax Court of Indiana.

December 27, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew C. Maternowski, Indianapolis, Indiana, Attorney for Petitioners.

Jeffrey A. Modisett, Attorney General of Indiana, David A. Arthur, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, Indiana, Attorneys for Respondent.

FISHER, J.

The petitioners, Keith and Mary Hall (Halls), challenge the Department of State Revenue's (Department) finding that the Halls owe controlled substance excise tax (CSET) in the amount of $11,382,640.00. The Halls have raised several issues for this Court's review; however, the Court will, at this time, dispose of one, which the Court restates as whether the Halls possessed the marijuana in question, making them liable under the CSET statute.

FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases