PER CURIAM.
In this premises liability case, plaintiff's deposition testimony about the location of her fall was confusing, argumentative, and non-specific. What can be gleaned is that plaintiff denied being in the unpaved area between lanes of the parking lot or stepping on or between the concrete car "bumpers." The remaining area is paved. The photograph of the paved surface does not reveal a recess or gap which would correspond to the plaintiff's description of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
