PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's rule 3.850 motion as untimely and successive. However, we reverse that part of the order which imposes sanctions barring appellant from filing any further pleadings in this case and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinions in Boston v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.