PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted of shooting into an occupied structure and argues that there was insufficient evidence to identify him as the shooter. We disagree. One witness identified appellant as the man carrying the machine gun, which was the weapon used in the shooting, and another witness identified appellant as the shooter. We therefore affirm.
GUNTHER, KLEIN and STEVENSON...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.