PER CURIAM.
In his Rule 3.850 motion for post conviction relief, appellant alleged that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to make an objection adequate to preserve an issue concerning the admissibility of expert psychological testimony to the effect that a child exhibited symptoms consistent with child sexual abuse syndrome. At the time appellant's trial took place, the admissibility issue had been certified to the supreme court. See Hadden v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.