PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted of D.U.I. and appeals on three grounds. He argues that the trial court erred in admitting a videotape of the incident, in allowing the prosecutor to argue in closing that he had "actual physical control of the vehicle" and in providing a jury instruction to the same effect. We affirm on all issues.
Prior to trial, appellant sought to exclude the audio portion of a videotape of the D.U.I. incident on the grounds that the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
