1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 972 P.2d
  5. 972 P.2d 955 (1999)
 

STATE v. BOBIC

Nos. 38038-9-I, 38161-0-I.

972 P.2d 955 (1999)

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Mihai BOBIC, Appellant, Ion Bobic, Mihai Martenuic, Defendants, and Igor Stepchuk, and each of them, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

March 15, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stella Buder; Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, for Appellant Stepchuk.

Eric Broman & Jim Dixon; Nielsen, Broman & Associates, Seattle, Wa., for Appellant Bobic.

Katherine Flack; Henry Corscadden; Charles Sainsbury, King County Prosecuting Atty., Seattle, Wa., for Respondent.

GROSSE, J.

The predicate inquiry to a double jeopardy analysis requires an informed definition of the offense for which it is alleged the State seeks multiple punishments. The crime of conspiracy in Washington can be defined to require the State charge and prove, as an element of the offense, the underlying felony that is the object of the conspiracy. That is how the State charged and proved the crimes at issue here.

Thus, while the defendants may have been...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases